Missoula 55°F, mostly cloudy
Opinion

Political scars for Obama

Story by Sean Breslin | April 16, 2008
Montana Kaimin

Send Us Your News Tips





Email Story



Digg This Story

Submit Link to Delicious

The recent flap over Barack Obama’s comments regarding rural voters being “bitter” about issues such as immigration, race, guns and religion is finally turning the media’s microscope on this year’s presidential darling. After weeks of swooning, we now see that Obama is nothing more than an elitist who doesn’t understand working-class voters and reverts to lowest common denominator to win votes. Right?

Sort of. His comments are disconcerting, but not because he said them. What’s unfortunate about the whole fiasco is that with all of Obama’s education and oratory and political skill, he failed to articulate why voters “cling” to these divisive issues. It’s not because they’re confused about their lots in life and are looking for someone to blame; it’s because national politicians have been running attack ads and giving stump speeches that seek to divide and conquer the electorate based on these wedge issues.

For too long, our leaders have framed our national dialogue in terms of black vs. white, rich vs. poor, gay vs. straight. No wonder people are voting based on these issues.

Obama is no demagogue playing to voters’ fears, nor is he trying to brush them off. His March speech on race relations in the United States proved that he sees the subtleties and complexities of a divisive issue, and that he’s willing to take on these issues and even say things that are unpopular.

But we’re having nothing of it. In some ways, people do cling to their opinions on guns and race because it’s easier than challenging our own assumptions. America was in an uproar in 2003, when then-Democratic frontrunner Howard Dean said Southern voters shouldn’t base their decisions on “race, guns, God and gays.” He was similarly admonished by the press, and the comments marked a turning point in Dean’s unsuccessful bid for the nomination.

Obama may weather this storm and still win the Democratic nomination, but not without some political scars. He’ll still go on talking frankly, and some might not want to hear what he has to say. But Obama has built his campaign on transcending divisive political debates. Now, he must rise above his own faults.

This story has been viewed 544 times.



Comments

What Obama said is not nearly as disturbing as the replies of his opponents, Hil and McCain, both of which made some statement to the effect of “these gun-owning Americans simply want to secure their traditional hunting rights.”

Last time I checked, the 2nd Amendment wasn’t worded “..the right of the people to hunt and fish shall not be infringed.”

I take it no matter who gets in, Dem or GOP, we’re probably going to see the return of the ridiculous “assault weapons” ban, where weapons are outlawed simply for looking spooky.
Idiot disclaimer: no, I am thousands of miles from conservative. Pro-gay marriage, anti-Iraq War, pro-universal healthcare, pro-gun.

Posted by Charles Copeland on 04/16/2008 at 8:08 am




Leave a Comment

Please register or sign in to leave a comment.